Talk:Code refactoring: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:46, 17 September 2006

Revision as of 08:45, 4 December 2006

Line 12:

If you want to talk about behaviour-preserving transformations in structural programs, (or in assembly code or declarative code or whatever) there are other terms, such as 'to restructurize' or 'to reengineer' or similar. Leave refactoring to OOP.

-- [http://www.peter.dembinski.prv.pl Peter]

:I disagree. Refactoring is not strictly bound to OOP. Refactoring is about behavior-preserving transformations, cleaning code, etc. Concepts that are common to all languages. It is true that some types of refactorings are more or less tied to OO concepts, but refactoring as a whole is not. --[[User:Henrik S. Hansen|Henrik S. Hansen]] 16:16, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Line 29:

Would it be appropriate to add information about tools that support refactoring, in this page? (For example, Eclipse etc)

--[[User:Peterl|peterl]] 01:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

== Factorization example ==

The factorization example given in the text has no relevance whatsoever to the fine art of refactoring. Please refactor this paragraph. Stud. polyt. Kalle Hagen 09:44 4 December 2006