Open-fields doctrine: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:54, 5 October 2019

Revision as of 03:02, 5 October 2019

Line 204:

===''State v. Bullock''===

{{Infobox court case

|name = State v. Bullock

|court = [[Montana Supreme Court]]

|full name = State of Montana v. Bill Bullock and Eddie Peterson

|date decided = {{start date|1995|08|04|df=us}}

|citations = 901 [[Pacific Reporter|P.2d]] 61

|judges = Trieweiler, Turnage, Nelson, Gray, Hunt, Weber and Leaphart

|number of judges = 7

|decision by = Triweiler

|prior actions = criminal trial and appeal

|appealed from = District Court for the Tenth Judicial District

|opinions = Trieweiler

|keywords = {{hlist | search | seizure }}

|italic title = no

}}

Contemporaneously with ''Johnson'', another case involving the open-fields doctrine began working its way through Montana's state courts. Unlike its state and federal predecessors, it involved [[Poaching|illegally taken game]] rather than marijuana cultivation.<ref name="State v. Bullock">{{cite court|litigants=State v. Bullock|vol=901|reporter=[[Pacific Reporter|P.2d]]|opinion=61|court=[[Montana Supreme Court|Mont.]]|date=1995|url=https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2059160847971143084|accessdate=September 21, 2019}}</ref>