Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Image optimization: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:03, 3 October 2019

Revision as of 07:48, 6 October 2019

Line 17:

* '''Comment'''. It is not nice to AfD an article just eight hours after its creation. Maybe its editor is a newbie and is still working on it. [[Special:Contributions/31.7.119.23|31.7.119.23]] ([[User talk:31.7.119.23|talk]]) 10:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

* '''comment''' The phrase seems to mean different things in different contexts. GScholar picks up the cited papers and others that most commonly refer to medical imaging, though some other applications appear as well. Web hits by contrast are dominated by optimization of image files for web transmission/display. [[User:Mangoe|Mangoe]] ([[User talk:Mangoe|talk]]) 19:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

** I feel this default context you mentioned exacerbates the article's counter-informativeness. [[User:flowing dreams|<span style="font-family: 'Ink Free', sans-serif;">flowing dreams</span>]] ([[User talk:flowing dreams|talk page]]) 07:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

* '''merge and redirect''' anything useful to [[digital image processing]]. [[User:Spinningspark|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] 22:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

* '''Comment''' "Digital image optimization" is a subset of [[Digital image processing]]. Given the breath of the existing literature on the topic, it seemed to me that an article would be appropriate, especially since the [[Digital image processing]] article did not directly address the topic. We used to create stub articles on Wikipedia on the premise that they could then be worked on communally. I hope that that hasn't changed. I strongly disagree with the Afd proposer that this article is synthesis. I have no theory to propose or ideology -- just facts from the literature. I urge those who are doing the analysis of whether to keep this article or not, to at least look at the materials in {{Cite book|chapter=Preface |year=2018 |editor1=Hemanth, Jude |editor2=Balas, Valentina Emilia |title=Nature Inspired Optimization Techniques for Image Processing Applications |publisher=Springer Verlag |___location=Cham, Switzerland |isbn=978-3-319-96002-9}}, which is just one of many works in the field. The recognition that DOI is regularly employed as a synonym in the medical field was intended to help other editors to find additional sources and then to provide additional text. [[User:Mangoe|Mangoe]] says above that the term "seems to mean different things in different contexts." This is both true at the specific level and not true on the general level. While different techniques are used for different purposes, the overall goal remains that same (namely to preserve information) whether to highlight specific information (medical often) or to allow compression for digital transmission. Since the [[WP:LEAD|lead]] is broad strokes, it is up to the resultant specific sections to discuss the differences. --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 22:03, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

** Hi. I agree with everything you said, but they have no bearing on the current discussion. My concern is that the article, in this state, is counter-informative, because of piecing together contents from different contexts. The sentence about losslessness is categorically harmful. I strongly believe you must have not published the article in this state. [[User:flowing dreams|<span style="font-family: 'Ink Free', sans-serif;">flowing dreams</span>]] ([[User talk:flowing dreams|talk page]]) 07:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)