Distributed scaffolding: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
adding links to references using Google Scholar
Cyu252 (talk | contribs)
I modified the definition of differentiated scaffolds and synergistic scaffolds, and I also added examples to elaborate on the concepts of the three sub-terms.
Line 32:
Tabak (2004) distinguishes between three different types of scaffolds: differentiated scaffolds, redundant scaffolds, and synergistic scaffolds.
 
#Differentiated scaffolds refer to cases where "different tools and representations support different needs" (Tabak & Kiza, 2018, p. 193). For example, when a group of students are constructing an initial explanation on or formulating their understanding of a phenomenon (e.g., natural selection), these needs may be better met with prompts provided in a simulation environment; on the other hand, when the students present their formal explanations to the whole class, a more directed and dialogic scaffolding provided by the teacher would help them more efficiently in refining their final explanations (Tabak, 2004).
#Differentiated scaffolds include the most basic types of support in which one scaffold is used per need for the task.
#Redundant scaffolds offer “different means of support that target the same need but are enacted at different points in time in the curriculum to provide titrated levels of support” (Tabak, 2004, p. 307). ThroughFor providinginstance, redundantwhen supportsstudents andare resources,expected theto studentjustify can usetheir eachdecision of thechoosing differentone typesdesign ofoption redundantrather scaffoldsthan untilanother, theprompts supportsin area nodesign longerdiary necessarymay help initiate some students’ justifications, but not all students'. ByIn supplyingthis multiplescenario, supportsthe students can possibly gain additional opportunity to engage in this manner,reflective process if during the tasksubsequent incorporateswhole-class naturaldiscussions fadingtheir intoteacher presses them to describe the designalternatives (Puntambakerthey &proposed Kolodnerand how they decided among these options (Tabak, 20052004).
Through providing redundant supports and resources, the student can use each of the different types of redundant scaffolds until the supports are no longer necessary. By supplying multiple supports in this manner, the task incorporates natural fading into the design (Puntambaker & Kolodner, 2005).
#Synergistic scaffolds are “multiple co-occurring and interacting supports for the same need” (Tabak, 2004, p. 307). This type of distributed scaffold incorporates different types of support to achieve a singular need.
#Synergistic scaffolds are “multiple co-occurring and interacting supports for the same need” (Tabak, 2004, p. 307). This type of distributed scaffold incorporates "different tools or agents that support the same skill in different ways" (Tabak & Kiza, 2018, p. 193). For example, when learning to manipulate variables in a virtual experiment, students may find it easier if "the teacher models the thinking while she or he uses the software that the students are using", such as "making appropriate menu selections and explicating his or her rationale for taking these actions" (Tabak, 2004, p. 319).
 
==References==