Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates/Fish and karate/Questions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Question from Clayoquot: reply |
→Question from Cassianto: reply |
||
Line 58:
#{{ACE Question
|Q=Last year, I was the named party in the ham-fisted [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions]], that was brought about as a result of a biased committee not being impartial. The case should've been entitled Infobox 3, but the committee considered it to be too difficult to deal with the infobox problem and instead, made the case exclusively about me - suffice to say, the problem with infobox discussions still exist. I wondered whether, in future cases, not exclusive to IB discussions, you would consider it more important to deal with the cause rather than just the symptom?
|A=I would not, in this case; Arbcom do not officiate over content, and the existence of infoboxes is not for Arbcom to adjudicate. Arbcom exists to address behavioural issues from users who are unwilling or unable to deal with other people in a civil and collegiate way. I will provide a fuller response if you rephrase your question to avoid uncivil and uncollegiate terms such as "ham-fisted", "biased", and "not being impartial".
}}
| |||