Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates/Fish and karate/Questions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Question from Leaky caldron: another follow up |
|||
Line 74:
|Q=So you believe that there is no problem? No differentiated treatment, intentional or otherwise?
|A=I did not say that. It is common knowledge that prolific content creators (and many administrators) are at times granted leeway ("net positive") others are not. This is a short-term utilitarian view of things that ignores the possibility/fact that allowing a select few to get away with rank incivility, gaming to get rid of "enemies", or other rule-breaking fosters a general perception that there are cliques of users who may say and act in ways others may not, and actively contributes in the long-term towards driving swathes of users away from the project, reducing the diversity and knowledge base of editors and making Wikipedia a place for the few, not the many. My point above was this should not be the case and should absolutely not be enshrined in policy.}}
#{{ACE Question
|Q=In what way is it short term? It has been endemic and unchallenged for more than a decade. What will you be doing about it when cases land in your AC in-tray?
|A=}}
===Questions from Joe Roe===
| |||