Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Talk:Pascal (programming language)) (bot |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Talk:Pascal (programming language)) (bot |
||
Line 10:
This is way too long, with recent attempts to 'correct' it making things even worse. Is it even necessary? All programming languages have their fans and those that dislike them, their good and bad features, but they don’t have anything like this amount of criticism that I’ve seen. It should either be pared down dramatically or removed altogether.--<small>[[User:JohnBlackburne|JohnBlackburne]]</small><sup>[[User_talk:JohnBlackburne|words]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/JohnBlackburne|deeds]]</sub> 00:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
:There was an entire page for C, but it was AfD'd into a merge, and all content lost. All the best: ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'',<small> 17:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC).</small><br />
== Extended Pascal ==
I noticed that the Extended Pascal section is just a reference to the equivalent ANSI standard with no discussion on its features, etc.
I'd like to come back on a rainy Saturday and greatly expand the section. Any objections?
I was the X3J9 secretary during Extended Pascal development and I've been a Pascal compiler developer since 1983.
John <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Johnreagan|Johnreagan]] ([[User talk:Johnreagan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Johnreagan|contribs]]) 12:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)</span></small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:No objections! All the best: ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'',<small> 17:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC).</small><br />
| |||