Community-based program design: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
m Alter: isbn. Add: pmid, oclc, year. Removed parameters. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | User-activated.
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0
Line 34:
 
=== Evaluation ===
An emerging and growing practice of program design is [[Program evaluation and review technique (PERT)|program evaluation]]. Evaluation can be seen as a cycle which involves the ongoing systematic assessment of a community-based program by collecting data from it, reviewing the data, changing the program as the data recommends, and then collecting data again. Program designers often choose to incorporate evaluation into design in order to check program processes, determine impact, build a base of support, and/or justify replication/expansion.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www2.aap.org/commpeds/htpcp/EvalGuide2.pdf|title=Evaluating your community-based program|date=2013|publisher=American Academy of Pediatrics|page=7|accessdate=May 9, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160626230841/http://www2.aap.org/commpeds/htpcp/EvalGuide2.pdf|archive-date=June 26, 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref>
 
== See also ==