Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 November 6: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:02, 15 November 2019

Revision as of 10:24, 15 November 2019

Line 34:

:* '''Propose merging''' [[:Category:950s books]] to [[:Category:10th-century books]]

:* '''Propose merging''' [[:Category:990s books]] to [[:Category:10th-century books]]

:'''Nominator's rationale:''' Between them, these four categories contain only one article, and four redirects. Each of the categories is categorised inside itself, which is very bad practice. Two of the categories ({{cl|930s books}} and {{cl|950s books}}) have previously been deleted, see [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 November 4#Early medieval works and books]], and an attempt (see [[Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 75#Clarification: scope of G4]]) to see if (i) two of these were eligible for [[WP:CSD#G4]] and (ii) whether the other two were ''also'' eligible for G4, despite not having featured in the earlier CFD, was inconclusive. [[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] &#x1f339; ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 20:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

* '''Support''' per nom. [[User:Marcocapelle|Marcocapelle]] ([[User talk:Marcocapelle|talk]]) 07:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

*'''Support''' per nom. I have now addressed the parenting by using {{tl|Bookdecade}} which generates automatic parent categories. – [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User talk:Fayenatic london|'''<span style="color: #FF0000;">L</span>'''ondon]] 13:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)