Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 16:
== Historical Context ==
Vision Scientists have expressed interest in how people perceive groups of objects for quite some time.
Vision Scientists have expressed interest in how people perceive groups of objects for quite some time. Some research in vision science has noted that although humans take in large amounts of visual information, adults are only able to process, attend to, and hold in memory up to about four items from the visual environment. <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Alvarez|first=G.A.|last2=Cavanagh|first2=P.|date=2004-02|title=The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects|url=https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x|journal=Psychological Science|language=en-US|volume=15|issue=2|pages=106–111|doi=10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x|issn=0956-7976}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Luck|first=Steven J.|last2=Vogel|first2=Edward K.|date=1997-11|title=The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/36846|journal=Nature|language=en|volume=390|issue=6657|pages=279–281|doi=10.1038/36846|issn=1476-4687}}</ref> These findings are inconsistent with the theory of ensemble coding. <br />▼
== Opposing Theories ==
▲
== Non-Social Ensemble Coding ==
|