Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace/Archive 16: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) from Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace) (bot |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace) (bot |
||
Line 754:
:::::{{u|Jonesey95}} and {{u|Cabayi}}, it just looks weird with space in reading mode. ___''[[User:CAPTAIN MEDUSA|<em style="font-family:grafolitascript;color:#aa6ef4">CAPTAIN MEDUSA</em>]]<small>[[User talk:CAPTAIN MEDUSA|'''<em style="font-family:grafolitascript;color:#000000">talk</em>''']] (We are the champions, my friends)</small>'' 13:11, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
:::::: {{not done}} per Cabayi above. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 21:21, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
== Relevant warning missing ==
Is it just me, or are we missing a rather important warning? Users who repeatedly delete sourced content because they claim it's incorrect. The delete-warnings do not cover it, as these users often add edit summaries (basically claiming they know better than sources). Similarly, even though it is POV-editing, POV does not really cover it either. Given that we have warnings both for adding unsourced material and for using bad sources, wouldn't it make sense to have warnings for deleting good sources based on [[WP:TRUTH]]. [[User:Jeppiz|Jeppiz]] ([[User talk:Jeppiz|talk]]) 23:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
| |||