Content deleted Content added
→Start with the theory?: Can we discuss rather than just revert? |
|||
Line 14:
I am disappointed to see that [[User:WAS 4.250|WAS 4.250]] has simply reverted my changes without discussion. OK - some of it is wrong. But what about the principle? I still feel the present opening is quite inadequate, jumping straight into a specific example (which is in effect made redundant lower down the page) without setting out the basic idea. [[User:Snalwibma|Snalwibma]] 10:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
:::: The article requires complete revision, knee-jerk reversal at this stage are not productive. We almost need to put a disclaimer across the top "UNDER CONSTRUCTION". Try you edits again. This can work if we think in terms of informative, accurate, yet minimize the enormous amount of supporting details that are problematic in the Main article. Perhaps first you could outline the major topics for the article that are relevant to understanding evolution. Then discussion over the outline could follow. Then the actually text can be composed, with readability in mind. Don't throw in the towel .... yet! --[[User:Random Replicator|Random Replicator]] 12:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
==Pictures==
| |||