Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace/Archive 16: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:09, 6 December 2019

Revision as of 04:07, 8 December 2019

Line 764:

:{{u|Beetstra}}, there's already a {{tl|uw-refspam}}, do you think that changing it to a multi-level template would be a better option? ^{<small>[[User:Creffpublic|creffpublic]]</small>} <sub style="margin-left:-8ex"><small>a [[User:Creffett|creffett]] franchise</small></sub> ([[User_talk:Creffett|talk to the boss]]) 13:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

::{{u|Creffett}}, I did not know that one .. but that does not really cover my case. There are more and more cases of editors placing (likely their) websites as references. Not necessarily 'a small group of researchers'. Some of these are plain 'spam' websites, not even research. So yes, maybe it is worth considering the multi-level set. [[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] ^{[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]} 13:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

== Change to [[Template:Uw-genre1]] ==

I suggest changing {{tq|Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies}} to {{xt|Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and'''/or''' verifiability policies}}, since it isn't always them both. [[User:Biscuit-in-Chief|<b><span style="color:teal">—Biscuit-in-Chief</span> <span style="color:#444e76">:-)</span></b>]] ^{([[User talk:Biscuit-in-Chief|Talk]] &ndash; [[Special:Contributions/Biscuit-in-Chief|Contribs]])} 15:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

:Seems reasonable enough to me. ^{<small>[[User:Creffpublic|creffpublic]]</small>} <sub style="margin-left:-8ex"><small>a [[User:Creffett|creffett]] franchise</small></sub> ([[User_talk:Creffett|talk to the boss]]) 21:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

:BOLDly done. [[User:Creffett|creffett]] ([[User talk:Creffett|talk]]) 01:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)