Revision as of 17:02, 9 December 2019 edit Drmccreedy (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Template editors 26,285 edits notes ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:10, 9 December 2019 edit undo BabelStone (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 15,629 edits →Reverted note. It's useful but misplaced. It should be in one of the articles that includes that chart. Individual characters aren't footnoted and if they were, there would be hundreds of footnotes in the charts.: Agree Next edit →
Line 20: I don't think notes about how a character is used belong in the 300+ code chart templates. I see this as a slippery slope that could lead to hundreds of notes. That said, I probably wouldn't have reverted the edit if the anchor had been on the title instead of the individual code point cell. I'm not sure if others would have though. I retain my position that an explaination of how HANGUL FILLER is used should appear in articles and not in the code chart template. [[User:Drmccreedy\|DRMcCreedy]] ([[User talk:Drmccreedy\|talk]]) 17:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC) :Agreed that notes on individual characters do not belong in the template, but should be added as text in the appropriate article, in this case [[Halfwidth and Fullwidth Forms (Unicode block)]]. However, the comment "It is meaningless in Unicode" is not appropriate and should be excluded or rewritten to explain exactly how it is meaningless in Unicode. [[User:BabelStone\|BabelStone]] ([[User talk:BabelStone\|talk]]) 17:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Template talk:Unicode chart Halfwidth and Fullwidth Forms: Difference between revisions