Content deleted Content added
Line 64:
: I gave it a try. I am not sure it is perfect but it is a start. Someone who is more expert or more patient than me can adjust it, resize it, etc.--[[User:Filll|Filll]] 20:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
::You could try and make it smaller but with the blue box on the right it will be hard to fit it in without everything getting cramped. Another possible ___location is in the montage, i have placed one in there for you to compare with the one at the top. Obviously this montage needs a good legend to link it with the text. [[User:David D.|David D.]] [[User talk:David D.|(Talk)]] 21:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
::::: Personally, I like the picture at the top; as someone said "we need to break up the text to reduce the intimidation factor." The lead in sections seems to be coming together nicely. Its a start. I would like to see the next section 'simplify' the tie in between Darwin and modern genetics. Maybe Population genetics could be the next subheading, with a summary of Hardy-Weinberg principles? I think the key here seems to be minimize examples and details and not feel a need to defend or define every sentence/word. Also compact, concise sentences.The section on convergent and co-evolution was in the original transfered entry. It is just hanging there at the moment. Hopefully, it will eventually have a tie in to the section. I also recommend staying away from Creationist / Evolution debate. Refer all challengers to the main page ... they can fight it out there. That said ... should we continue or is this too redundant or perhaps distracting from the main article? I hate to invest the time; only to find the community at large thinks it absurd. --[[User:Random Replicator|Random Replicator]] 04:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
| |||