Content deleted Content added
Intangible2.0 (talk | contribs)
Intangible2.0 (talk | contribs)
Line 15:
:There are two more accounts linked to my static ip, but I have only once made an article edit two months ago with one of them, and some talk page comments a couple of days ago. Nothing abusive, although they are blocked now. I only want to have that slanderous comment removed from [[New-Flemish Alliance]]. [[User:Intangible2.0|Intangible2.0]] 14:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
::I don't see a case for a week long block for sock puppetry. As you say, the two Pinko accounts were used briefly and not on any articles that Intangible worked on. It's a minor violation at best, and there is no violation with Intangible2.0 since Intangible was not under block when you abandoned that account. Do you agree to use Intangible2.0 as your only account and that the arbcom limitations placed on Intagible apply to Intangible2.0? [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 14:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
::::<strike>:::Me being blocked for a week or so now seems to be more important than removing slanderous comments from Wikipedia itself. Being blocked for "intentions" is simply a mute point, since I am editing from a static ip. When will somone remove those slanderous comments? [[User:Intangible2.0|Intangible2.0]] 14:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)</strike>Sure. I will use only this account from now. But can I at least remove those comments from [[New-Flemish Alliance]]? Or will I be blocked again when I do so? Maybe it is best then for someone else to remove them? [[User:Intangible2.0|Intangible2.0]] 14:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)