Talk:Australia: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:20, 10 December 2006

Revision as of 02:23, 10 December 2006

Line 430:

:::Please don't accuse people of bias just cos they don't agree with the way you want to edit articles. You know nothing of my views and you'd be a fool if you presume you do. please assume good faith. What is your bias? ABS is a good objective source. If not try some peer reviewed academic articles. They may too have a bias, but at least they are of quality and are forced to show some sort of discipline, rather than just advocate a position which is the sole purpose of lobby group or advocacy group (no matter how admirable). --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 01:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

::::One wonders if you have actually read the link I provided. The way you keep bringing up human rights groups makes me think you didn't even click on the link, since the article it connects was <i>written solely from ABS data</i>. Consistently removing a link containing objective data (and coupled with personal comments against me) is biased. Calling human rights groups "completely unreliable" is biased (note, if you had called their conclusions into question based on objective data that disputed it, that would be fine, but to automatically group all human rights organisations together and prejudge them as completely unreliable is biased). "Good faith" can only stretch so far. [[User:Sad mouse|Sad mouse]] 02:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

:::::You are completely unreasonable. You say you had consensus for your edits - that is incorrect. You accusse people of bias and then of not reading links they post simply cos they don't agree. Did you read the link to "let facts speak for themselves?

:::::"completely" is i admit perhaps an exageration, but if they weren't biased they wouldn't be in the business. They are political groups with a position to push (not unlike you, right?). How can they not be biased? Bias doesn't mean wrong anyway (although i know that is what you intended when you accuse me of bias). Facts please - not interpretations or opinions.

:::::I DID click and read some of the linked article. You are foolish to continue make judgements when you know nothing about an editor or their views. Perhaps if you found a better way to actually write the link in, then maybe there might some support. But please stop asserting you have consensus and accusing people of bias. So, you have no bias, is that right? --[[User:Merbabu|Merbabu]] 02:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)