Content deleted Content added
SkylabField (talk | contribs) →Criticism: Not sure if this is the correct style, but using “Moderation Management” the first time the group is mentioned in a paragraph, and MM for subsequent mentions. |
SkylabField (talk | contribs) →Methodology: MOS:ACROFIRSTUSE does not actually specify how often we use the full version and how often we use the acronym. To be consistent, I will use “Moderation Management” the first time it’s used in a section, and MM elsewhere in the section. |
||
Line 16:
==Methodology==
The MM limits and guidelines were derived from the work of Dr. Martha Sanchez-Craig.<ref name="SANCHEZCRAIG2005">{{Cite journal|last=Sanchez-Craig |first=Martha |title=Empirically based guidelines for moderate drinking: 1-year results from three studies with problem drinkers |journal=American Journal of Public Health |volume=85 |issue=6 |pages=823–828 |author2=Wilkinson, D. Adrian |author3=Davila, Rafaela |year=1995 |pmid=7762717 |doi=10.2105/AJPH.85.6.823 |pmc=1615483}}</ref> MM members are encouraged, but do not need to follow, the suggested guidelines, limits and steps. MM does not view non-dependent problem drinkers as [[alcoholism|alcoholics]], but rather people with a bad, but controllable, [[Habit (psychology)|habit]]. MM does not state that [[Surrender (spirituality and psychology)|surrender]] or [[spirituality]] is needed to end or control the habit.<ref name="ROTGERS2000">{{Cite journal|last=Rotgers |first=Frederick |author2=Kishline, Audrey |title=Moderation Management: A support group for persons who want to reduce their drinking, but not necessarily abstain |journal=International Journal of Self-Help and Self Care |year=1999–2000 |pages=145–158 |volume=1 |issue=2 |doi=10.2190/8909-FFH3-44BA-HKVN}}</ref> MM literature makes a similar distinction to Alcoholics Anonymous literature that there are problem drinkers who can return to controlled drinking and alcoholics who can not.<ref name="HUMPHREYS2003">{{Cite journal|last=Humphreys |first=Keith |title=Alcohol & drug abuse: A research-based analysis of the Moderation Management controversy |journal=Psychiatric Services |volume=54 |date=May 2003 |pages=621–622 |pmid=12719491 |doi=10.1176/appi.ps.54.5.621 |issue=5}}</ref>
|