Content deleted Content added
Assessment: +Computing: class=C, importance=Low, science=y, science-importance=Low, software=y, software-importance=Low (assisted) |
|||
Line 10:
By the way, it's impossible to write that "Karatsuba algorithm is a notable example of "Divide and Conquer" or "Binary Splitting", since just Karatsuba invented this idea, the names "Divide and Conquer", "Binary Splitting" were called much later. Somebody called the Karatsuba idea "Divide and Conquer", so Karatsuba didn't use somebody else' idea, somebody else used the Karatsuba idea. See you the difference? To write "Karatsuba algorithm is a notable example of "Divide and Conquer" means to write that Karatsuba used the method "Divide and Conquer" to create a fast multiplication, but Karatsuba just invented this method (in computational mathematics).[[Special:Contributions/91.79.192.32|91.79.192.32]] ([[User talk:91.79.192.32|talk]]) 14:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
The comments above by 91.79.192.32 are utter nonsense and reflect a near complete lack of cognitive competence. Relative timing of the development of concepts and algorithms has no bearing on whether the algorithms are examples of the concepts. -- [[User:Jibal|Jibal]] ([[User talk:Jibal|talk]]) 22:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
== Divide and conquer ==
| |||