Content deleted Content added
→Requested move 14 February 2019: '''Not moved'''. With respect to the first item, there is a clear trend in the discussion going against the proposal. With respect to the rest, there is a clear consensus against the proposal. |
→Proposed merge & split: new section |
||
Line 195:
*:I like the naming being consistent across articles. So keep it as it is IMO. [[User:Thue|Thue]] ([[User talk:Thue|talk]]) 21:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->
== Proposed merge & split ==
Yes, it makes sense to split the material specific to the original "SDRAM" generation, as opposed to information common to the entire family of standards, to {{no redirect|SDR SDRAM}}, and then merge [[PC66]], [[PC100]], and [[PC133]] into the newly split {{no redirect|SDR SDRAM}}. – [[User:Wbm1058|wbm1058]] ([[User talk:Wbm1058|talk]]) 20:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
| |||