Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onyx (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Updating nomination page with notices (assisted) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7:
Dead language that was never really alive. No good refs. —<span style="font-family: serif">'''''[[User:Wasell|<span style="color: #0a0">Wasell</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Wasell|(<span style="color: #e66">T</span>)]]</sup>'''''</span> 17:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 18:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' - Not notable for an article on its own. It gets a mention on [[List of programming languages]] which will become a red link on deletion, but not a reason to retain it. I have added it to [[List of programming languages by type#Stack-based_languages]] with a reference. That is sufficient information for readers to locate the historical information should they be so interested, and to ensure deletion here does not consign it to total oblivion. There is really not much more that can go on this Wikipedia page (except for the interesting aside that the stack could grow from both ends). I searched for [[WP:RS]] but could find nothing. I thought I had found an article in the Linux Journal but that turns out to be for a completely different Onyx.[https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/2737]. Onyx code is still available - it is Open Source - but there seems to be almost no visibility for the language beyond a burst of hype in 2004. Thus deletion of its own page is correct. -- [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 23:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
|