Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Computer networking task force: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 24:
Thanks. — [[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {<sup>[[User talk:Headbomb|ταλκ]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|κοντριβς]]</sub> – [[WP:PHYS|WP Physics]]} 08:59, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
Dear all, I just started writing my very first Wikipedia article ever. However, I underestimated the complexity and was not aware of review processes. So it seems I should have added some metainformation so that my article shows up here or in a related project, if I get things right. So, how do I get the following article reviewed? [[Draft:EEBUS]] Is this the right project? If the official answer is that I cannot skip the (currently) estimated 6 months of review, I will of course accept this. But as a newbie this is a little frustrating right now. I appreciate your help! [[User:DrJHinker|DrJHinker]] ([[User talk:DrJHinker|talk]]) 07:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)▼
== WikiProject cleanup listing ==
Line 387 ⟶ 384:
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScK30kJtKQ3cp-QLY1VJhB94HP2q6437Cdk3E2rVRYHowcL4A/viewform?usp=sf_link this Google form] where you can leave your response. [[User:Walkerma|Walkerma]] ([[User talk:Walkerma|talk]]) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:JJMC89@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/ListOfProjects&oldid=923068486 -->
==[[Draft:EEBUS]]==
▲Dear all, I just started writing my very first Wikipedia article ever. However, I underestimated the complexity and was not aware of review processes. So it seems I should have added some metainformation so that my article shows up here or in a related project, if I get things right. So, how do I get the following article reviewed? [[Draft:EEBUS]] Is this the right project? If the official answer is that I cannot skip the (currently) estimated 6 months of review, I will of course accept this. But as a newbie this is a little frustrating right now. I appreciate your help! [[User:DrJHinker|DrJHinker]] ([[User talk:DrJHinker|talk]]) 07:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
:{{re|DrJHinker}} Congratulations! It looks like you have it properly queued for review at [[WP:AFC]]. The AFC process is optional for [[WP:AUTOCONFIRMED]] editors. Once your user account is 4 days old and you have made 10 edits with it, you should be able to [[WP:MOVE]] your draft to mainspace yourself. The AFC process is valuable if you have a [[WP:COI]] or are concerned about your article being unceremoniously deleted due to issues that AFC reviewers can help you resolve. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 00:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||