Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Computer networking task force: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 388:
Dear all, I just started writing my very first Wikipedia article ever. However, I underestimated the complexity and was not aware of review processes. So it seems I should have added some metainformation so that my article shows up here or in a related project, if I get things right. So, how do I get the following article reviewed? [[Draft:EEBUS]] Is this the right project? If the official answer is that I cannot skip the (currently) estimated 6 months of review, I will of course accept this. But as a newbie this is a little frustrating right now. I appreciate your help! [[User:DrJHinker|DrJHinker]] ([[User talk:DrJHinker|talk]]) 07:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
:{{re|DrJHinker}} Congratulations! It looks like you have it properly queued for review at [[WP:AFC]]. The AFC process is optional for [[WP:AUTOCONFIRMED]] editors. Once your user account is 4 days old and you have made 10 edits with it, you should be able to [[WP:MOVE]] your draft to mainspace yourself. The AFC process is valuable if you have a [[WP:COI]] or are concerned about your article being unceremoniously deleted due to issues that AFC reviewers can help you resolve. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 00:
| |||