Revision as of 14:21, 18 May 2019 edit Taxi For Maicon (talk \| contribs) 6 edits →Allocation Example is NOT using d'Hondt ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:04, 11 February 2020 edit undo 89.102.172.8 (talk) →Allocation Example is NOT using d'Hondt Next edit →
Line 333: --[[User:Taxi For Maicon\|Taxi For Maicon]] ([[User talk:Taxi For Maicon\|talk]]) 14:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC) As already stated, not only is the Allocation section not using d'Hondt method (divisors), it is using the formula for a completely different Droop/Hagenbach-Bischoff method (quotas). This is unacceptable and needs to get fixed ASAP. Sources: Taagepera, R., & Shugart, M. S. (1989). Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven: Yale University Press. (p. 31); Nohlen, D. (1990). Wahlrecht und Parteiensystem. Opladen: Leske Verlag + Budrich GmbH. (p. 81); Lijphart, A. (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. New York: Oxford University Press. (p. 155-157, 192); Farrell, D. M. (1997) Comparing Electoral Systems. London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf. (p. 62-64)

Talk:D'Hondt method: Difference between revisions