Talk:Lateralization of brain function/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:25, 25 December 2018

Revision as of 02:35, 8 March 2020

Line 470:

Hi {{ping|Luveviolet}}, I just wanted to touch on the edit you recently made, which [[user:Flyer22_Reborn|Flyer22_Reborn]] reverted. I noticed that the text you inserted referred to individuals' learning styles several times, and that the sources were fairly old (early 2000s). As described in [[Learning styles|our article]] on them, the concept individuals having particular learning styles is somewhat controversial, and my understanding is that the accepted position in up-to-date educational psychology scholarship is that they don't. I have some books on the shelf I could dig out to provide references for this if needs be. As Flyer22 said, I think the language would have to be softened, and more recent sources would shed some light on whether anyone still stands by these theories. Cheers [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 18:56, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

==Criticism section==

::"Function lateralization, such as semantics, intonation, accentuation, and prosody, has since been called into question and largely been found to have a neuronal basis in both hemispheres."

It would be useful to have a proper, referenced and thorough criticism section / update of this model. It already states that much pop psychology has run with the idea of over-simipfications of hemispheric functions. Much more is needed. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;">[[User:Anna Roy|Anna]] ([[User talk:Anna Roy|talk]])</span> 20:42, 8 December 2019 (UTC)