Future Attribute Screening Technology: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Monkbot (talk | contribs)
m References: Task 16: replaced (2×) / removed (0×) deprecated |dead-url= and |deadurl= with |url-status=;
rm credentials, bold, punct.
Line 1:
[[File:fast tsa screen.jpg|thumb|right|250px|FAST screenshot (blurred)]]
'''Future Attribute Screening Technology''' ('''FAST''')<ref>[https://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2008/09/precrime-detector-is-showing-p.html newscientist.com]</ref> is a program created by the [[Department of Homeland Security]]. It was originally titled [[Project Hostile Intent]]. The purpose is to detect "Mal Intent" by screening people for "psychological and physiological indicators"<ref name=natg/> in a "Mobile Screening Laboratory".<ref name=dtic/>
 
==Background ==
Line 31:
*[[Draper Lab]], Boston, MA<ref name=natg/>
**$2.6 million DHS contract in 2009<ref name=siw/>
*[[Navy Research Laboratory]] - working—working on a FAST related project<ref name=siw/>
 
==Controversy==
 
Other researchers, such as Tom Ormerod of the Investigative Expertise Unit at the UK's [[Lancaster University]], argue that ordinary travel anxieties could cause false positives - Ormerodpositives—Ormerod told ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' "even having an iris scan or fingerprint read at immigration is enough to raise the heart rate of most legitimate travellers".<ref name=nature1/> Others noted that the basic premise may be flawed. Steven Aftergood, a senior research analyst at the Federation of American Scientists, stated "I believe that the premise of this approach — thatapproach—that there is an identifiable physiological signature uniquely associated with malicious intent — isintent—is mistaken. To my knowledge, it has not been demonstrated." The ''Nature'' article in which he was quoted went on to note that Altergood is concerned that the technology "will produce a large proportion of false positives, frequently tagging innocent people as potential terrorists and making the system unworkable in a busy airport."<ref name=nature1/>
 
Due to the ability of the system to 'read people's thoughts', it is potentially in violation of privacy laws such as the [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fourth]] and [[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution]]. A summary of the scientific and legal issues with the program was presented at [[DEF CON]] in 2011 by independent security researchers.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=[[DEF CON]] |title=DEF CON 19 Speakers |url=https://www.defcon.org/html/defcon-19/dc-19-speakers.html#Rezchikov |accessdate=2011-11-12}}</ref>
Line 41:
== See also ==
*[[Backscatter X-ray]]
*Dr. [[Lawrence Farwell]]
*[[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution]]
*[[The Minority Report]]