Content deleted Content added
rv per discussion at Talk:Evolution#Reference_added_to_numerous_evolution-related_pages |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) m Alter: title, last1. Add: title-link, author pars. 1-1. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Activated by User:AManWithNoPlan | All pages linked from User:AManWithNoPlan/sandbox2 | via #UCB_webform_linked |
||
Line 17:
=== C-value paradox ===
In 1948, Roger and Colette Vendrely reported a "remarkable constancy in the nuclear DNA content of all the cells in all the individuals within a given animal species",<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Vendrely R, Vendrely C|year=1948 |title=La teneur du noyau cellulaire en acide désoxyribonucléique à travers les organes, les individus et les espèces animales: Techniques et premiers résultats |journal=Experientia |volume=4 |pages=434–436 |doi=10.1007/bf02144998 |pmid=18098821 |issue=11}}</ref> which they took as evidence that [[DNA]], rather than [[protein]], was the substance of which [[genes]] are composed. The term C-value reflects this observed constancy. However, it was soon found that C-values ([[genome size]]s) vary enormously among species and that this bears no relationship to the ''presumed'' number of genes (''as reflected by'' the [[complexity]] of the [[organism]]).<ref name="Ancestor">{{cite book |title=
The discovery of [[non-coding DNA]] in the early 1970s resolved the main question of the C-value paradox: [[genome size]] does not reflect [[gene]] number in [[eukaryotes]] since most of their DNA is non-coding and therefore does not consist of genes. The [[human genome]], for example, comprises less than 2% protein-coding regions, with the remainder being various types of non-coding DNA (especially [[transposable elements]]).<ref>{{Cite journal
|