Revision as of 01:27, 15 December 2006 edit Judgesurreal777 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 50,231 edits mNo edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:39, 16 December 2006 edit undo Judgesurreal777 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 50,231 edits adding award Next edit →
Line 13: ==Reception== Reaction from the United States Congress has been mixed, with some expressing reservations to the rating system.<ref>{{cite web \|author =Amelia Gruber\| title=OMB seeks agency outreach on linking performance to budgets\| publisher=govexec.com \| year=March 4th, 2004 \| url=http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0304/030404a1.htm\| accessdate=2006-12-14}}</ref> The program won the 2005 Government Innovators Network Award, noting that the programs reception has led to similar program evaluation systems in Scotland and Thailand.<ref>{{cite web \|author =\| title=Program Assessment Rating Tool\| publisher=Government Innovators Network \| year=January 1st, 2006 \| url=http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/awards.html?id=7496\| accessdate=2006-12-15}}</ref> ==References==

Program Assessment Rating Tool: Difference between revisions