Content deleted Content added
→Link on filesystem infobox: response |
|||
Line 9:
::In the context of filesystems, it doesn't make any sense to talk about transparent block device-level encryption (disk encryption) - as any filesystem supports this method as long as the operating system has a means for disk encryption. I think the link caption in the filesystem infobox template should be changed instead to make it more clear. And I don't see a need for rename, either - there already are articles on [[full disk encryption]] and [[disk encryption]] which cover the disk-level encryption part. In my opinion, separating these is a good thing, as they are conceptually very different - although a generic article comparing the two would be nice to have, too. As for enhancing, name one article on Wikipedia that ''shouldn't'' be enhanced? ;) -- [[User:Intgr|intgr]] 22:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
==Naming==
Wikipedia appears to have a de facto standard of spelling out "file system" as separate words instead of "filesystem"; however, I don't think the title of this article (or any links) should follow that, as the phrase "file system-level encryption" could be interpreted as "system-level file encryption" which is not quite right – file system is a precise technical term. Opinions? -- [[User:Intgr|intgr]] 03:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
| |||