Content deleted Content added
Comparison with object-oriented programming |
|||
Line 73:
The fact that C# is included in the list of procedural programming languages but Java is omitted. It seems to me that the only support both languages have for procedural programming is made possible through the class construct, which is an inherently object oriented construct. While I'm not sure I want to start a war over whether this support is enough to consider the languages procedural, I would think that given their similarities, either both should be included or both should be omitted. For now, I've added Java, but I think this might warrant more discussion. [[User:Mrtrumbe|Taft]] 20:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
: [[User:PJTraill|PJTraill]] 17:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC) I've extracted both from the list, added a criterion for this, mentioned both there, left C++ in with minor changes to the comment.
== Comparison with object-oriented programming ==
I would like to see less of the editorial slant in favor of OOP in that topic.
For example,
instead of using phrases like "it's undeniable that OOP is better at"
please use phrases like "Many people believe that OOP is better at".
Also, I would like to see some more information about how POP
can be superior to OOP.
| |||