Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m →Superconductivity: Typo fixing, replaced: latter → later |
||
Line 33:
Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub> is believed to be a fairly two-dimensional system, with superconductivity occurring primarily on the Ru-O plane. The electronic structure of Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub> is characterized by three bands derived from the Ru t<sub>2g</sub> 4d orbitals, namely, α, β and γ bands, of which the first is hole-like while the other two are electron-like. Among them, the γ band arises mainly from the d<sub>xy</sub> orbital, while the α and β bands emerge from the hybridization of d<sub>xz</sub> and <sub>yz</sub> orbitals. Due to the two-dimensionality of Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub>, its [[Fermi surface]] consists of three nearly two-dimensional sheets with little dispersion along the crystalline c-axis and that the compound is nearly magnetic.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Mazin | first=I. I. | last2=Singh | first2=David J. | title=Ferromagnetic Spin Fluctuation Induced Superconductivity in Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub> | journal=Physical Review Letters | publisher=American Physical Society (APS) | volume=79 | issue=4 | date=1997-07-28 | issn=0031-9007 | doi=10.1103/physrevlett.79.733 | pages=733–736| arxiv=cond-mat/9703068 }}</ref>
Early proposals have suggested that superconductivity is dominant in the γ band. In particular, the candidate [[chiral p-wave]] order parameter in the momentum space exhibits k-dependence phase winding which is characteristic of time-reversal symmetry breaking. This peculiar single-band superconducting order is expected to give rise to appreciable spontaneous supercurrent at the edge of the sample. Such an effect is closely associated with the topology of the Hamiltonian describing Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub> in the superconducting state, which is characterized by a nonzero [[Chern number]]. However, scanning probes have so far failed to detect expected time-reversal symmetry breaking fields generated by the supercurrent, off by orders of magnitude.<ref name=Hicks2010>{{cite journal|last=Hicks|first=Clifford W.|title=Limits on superconductivity-related magnetization in Sr2RuO4 and PrOs4Sb12 from scanning SQUID microscopy|journal=Physical Review B|year=2010|volume=81|issue=21|pages=214501|doi=10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501|arxiv = 1003.2189 |bibcode = 2010PhRvB..81u4501H |display-authors=etal}}</ref> This has led some to speculate that superconductivity arises dominantly from the α and β bands instead.<ref name=Raghu2010>{{cite journal|last1=Raghu|first1=S.|last2=Marini|first2=Aharon|last3=Pankratov|first3=Steve|title=Hidden Quasi-One-Dimensional Superconductivity in Sr2RuO4|url=http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v105/i13/e136401|journal= Physical Review Letters|volume=105|issue=13| page=136401|year=2010|arxiv = 1003.3927 |bibcode = 2010PhRvL.105b6401B |doi = 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.026401|pmid=20867720|last4=Rubio|first4=Angel }}</ref> Such a two-band superconductor, although having k-dependence phase winding in its order parameters on the two relevant bands, is topologically trivial with the two bands featuring opposite Chern numbers. Therefore, it could possibly give a much reduced if not completely cancelled supercurrent at the edge. However, this naive reasoning was
T<sub>c</sub> seems to increase under uniaxial compression.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Steppke | first=Alexander | last2=Zhao | first2=Lishan | last3=Barber | first3=Mark E. | last4=Scaffidi | first4=Thomas | last5=Jerzembeck | first5=Fabian | last6=Rosner | first6=Helge | last7=Gibbs | first7=Alexandra S. | last8=Maeno | first8=Yoshiteru | last9=Simon | first9=Steven H. | last10=Mackenzie | first10=Andrew P. | last11=Hicks | first11=Clifford W. | title=Strong peak in T<sub>c</sub> of Sr<sub>2</sub>RuO<sub>4</sub> under uniaxial pressure | journal=Science | publisher=American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) | volume=355 | issue=6321 | date=2017-01-12 | issn=0036-8075 | doi=10.1126/science.aaf9398 | page=eaaf9398| pmid=28082534 | hdl=10023/10113 | hdl-access=free }}</ref>
|