Fixed-point lemma for normal functions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
OAbot (talk | contribs)
m Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot.
m typo: a<A -> a \in A
Line 6:
* <math>f</math> is '''continuous''': for every limit ordinal <math>\lambda</math> (i.e. <math>\lambda</math> is neither zero nor a successor), <math>f(\lambda)=\sup\{f(\alpha):\alpha<\kappa\}</math>.
It can be shown that if <math>f</math> is normal then <math>f</math> commutes with [[supremum|suprema]]; for any nonempty set <math>A</math> of ordinals,
:<math>f(\sup A)=\sup f(A) = \sup\{f(\alpha):\alpha< \in A\}</math>.
Indeed, if <math>\sup A</math> is a successor ordinal then <math>\sup A</math> is an element of <math>A</math> and the equality follows from the increasing property of <math>f</math>. If <math>\sup A</math> is a limit ordinal then the equality follows from the continuous property of <math>f</math>.