Revision as of 01:06, 8 May 2020 edit Natkuhn (talk \| contribs) 129 edits →Highly skeptical that the remarks "said to have [been] added" by Brouwer are actually due to him: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:07, 8 May 2020 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,773 edits m Signing comment by Natkuhn - "→Highly skeptical that the remarks "said to have [been] added" by Brouwer are actually due to him: new section" Next edit →
Line 57: The citation is apparently from a French-language educational TV show (https://archive.is/20130113210953/http://archives.arte.tv/hebdo/archimed/19990921/ftext/sujet5.html). The remarks appear to be spoken by a fictional Brouwer trying to explain his result. The web page that this refers to gives no citation. I would like to know who originally came up with the "crumpled paper theorem" explanation of the BFPT. It could have been Brouwer himself, but my guess is it was not. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Natkuhn\|Natkuhn]] ([[User talk:Natkuhn#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Natkuhn\|contribs]]) 01:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Talk:Brouwer fixed-point theorem: Difference between revisions