Wikipedia:Quick guide to reviewing new articles: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Subject-specific guides: Food |
→Science: add Ethnic groups |
||
Line 88:
{{see also|WP:NASTRO}}
When evaluating the notability of a scientific concept, the main thing is to check that papers have been published on the subject by scientists working independently of each other: cross check the full authors list of cited papers. Google Scholar is a good place to search for coverage. Many papers will be paywalled, and in some cases you may have to make educated guesses based only on a paper's title and abstract.
====Ethnic groups====
Most ethnic groups that are verifiably distinct subjects are notable, but poorly sourced articles on these subjects may be better off merged into a higher-level article, if one is available. Academic sources are strongly preferred, but some non-academic publications may be usable, and are likely to indicate that additional, more reliable coverage exists. Potentially contentious claims should be referred to OR, FRINGE, or RS noticeboards as needed.
====Medicine====
| |||