Content deleted Content added
Line 351:
So why did David Eppstein delete it? The Squaring the circle page has a series of references to even books and popular science and non peer reviewed web-cites. As asked before, how many peer reviewed papers on Squaring the Circle has been published in the last 20 years (in decent journals)? Whoever put in the new section (unknown to me) also seems to have put it under the right section. It is not a section that endorse it. It is simply a section made on the Squaring the Circle page long time ago that simply state "Other modern claims". And under this section two non peer review books are mentioned. But a peer reviewed paper paper, that claim to give new light on the problem and also do not hide that it "We could argue that this is bending the rules and moving the problem of transcendental ⇡ into a transcendental velocity between the reference frames, rather than directly into the construction of the Circle and the Square. Still, one could just as well argue that the previous attempts to Square the Circle have not taken into account that observations of space and time are a↵ected by motion, and that space and time are closely connected." https://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1514&context=tme . [[User:MetricoGeo|MetricoGeo]] ([[User talk:MetricoGeo|talk]]) 10:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Ahaha, I wondered about this deletion, the investigated a bit further. Eppstein that quickly deleted someone referring this this paper is the same guy (active on wikipedia) that deleted Haug's wikipedia page some years ago. A wikipedia page that had been there for more than 10 years. Eppstein is allergic to Haug's work, and he want to delete as much of references to Haug's work as possible
| |||