Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 0 sources and tagging 1 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0 |
move outside |
||
Line 55:
The project has generated considerable online debate, in the search,<ref>[http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060922-104102 Search Engine Watch article] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070127201118/http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060922-104102 |date=27 January 2007 }}</ref> content<ref>[http://shore.com/commentary/newsanal/items/2006/200601002publishdrm.html Shore.com article about ACAP] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061021020607/http://shore.com/commentary/newsanal/items/2006/200601002publishdrm.html |date=21 October 2006 }}</ref> and intellectual property<ref>[http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=408&res=1280_ff&print=0 IP Watch article about ACAP]</ref> communities. If there are any common themes in commentary, they are
# that keeping the specification simple will be critical to its successful implementation, and
# that the aims of the project are focussed on the needs of publishers, rather than readers. Many have seen this as a flaw.<ref name="douglas" /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/iandouglas/jan2008/acapshootsback.htm |title=Acap shoots back |first=Ian |last=Douglas |date=23 December 2007 |work=[[The Daily Telegraph]] |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080907233655/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/iandouglas/jan2008/acapshootsback.htm |archive-date=7 September 2008 }}<!--alternate archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304085425/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/iandouglas/3624261/Acap_shoots_back/ -->
== See also ==
| |||