Talk:Comparison of HTML editors: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:10, 25 June 2019

Revision as of 18:27, 27 May 2020

Line 61:

There should be a column for whether or not the editor has a preview pane. To users of front page or other legacy editors this is a important feature. Though personally i prefer [[VIM]]. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.99.65.8|216.99.65.8]] ([[User talk:216.99.65.8|talk]]) 11:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I agree. The key comparison here is the convenience of being able to preview your work quickly and without back-and-forthing with your web browser. In some cases, like Dreamweaver starting sometime before CS5.5, it works in "real time" (but not really). I propose that this replaces the "page preview" column since, while both have the same result in mind (previewing your content), a button that opens the current file in a web browser is not only practically a standard in HTML editors, but also child's play in coding terms. Any further opinions? [[User:StigmaOfTruth|StigmaOfTruth]] ([[User talk:StigmaOfTruth|talk]]) 18:27, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

===link for syntax===

[[User:Dogru144|Dogru144]] ([[User talk:Dogru144|talk]]) 00:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)