Revision as of 06:44, 1 June 2020 edit Anilped (talk \| contribs) 225 edits →The article is one of the best introduction to finite element method . But the use of greens identities is not clear. we are in plane the weak formulation of p2 be derived more explicitly. in P1 use of mean value theorem be made explicit.: new section Tag: 2017 wikitext editor ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:45, 1 June 2020 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,748 edits m Signing comment by Anilped - "→The article is one of the best introduction to finite element method . But the use of greens identities is not clear. we are in plane the weak formulation of p2 be derived more explicitly. in P1 use of mean value theorem be made explicit.: new section" Next edit →
Line 522: please avoid lengthy discussions on h and subdivisions can be understood intuitively. But solve an explict one dime problem completely . Also use of Gallerkin is not made explicit . please make that use explicit in the problem. if these changes are done this can be most seductive logical introduction to fem . no good succint explnation exists on NET <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Anilped\|Anilped]] ([[User talk:Anilped#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Anilped\|contribs]]) 06:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Talk:Finite element method: Difference between revisions