Field-programmable analog array: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
m Alter: template type. Add: issue, volume, journal, pages, year, isbn, chapter, doi, author pars. 1-5. Removed URL that duplicated unique identifier. Formatted dashes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Activated by User:AManWithNoPlan | via #UCB_toolbar
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Alter: template type. Add: isbn, pages, volume, doi, series, chapter, s2cid, author pars. 1-3. Removed URL that duplicated unique identifier. Formatted dashes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Activated by AManWithNoPlan | All pages linked from User:AManWithNoPlan/sandbox2 | via #UCB_webform_linked
Line 8:
 
== History ==
The term FPAA was first used in 1991 by Lee and Gulak.<ref name="1 Lee and Gulak">{{cite document|title=A CMOS Field-programmable analog array," Solid-State Circuits|doi=10.1109/4.104162}}</ref> They put forward the concept of CABs that are connected via a routing network and configured digitally. Subsequently, in 1992<ref name="2 Lee and Gulak">{{cite web|url=https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/54e0/a44d6cfca95ba9dccdf567cf1f828bd2ee0d.pdfdocument|title=Field programmable analogue array based on MOSFET transconductors|s2cid=15702616}}</ref> and 1995<ref name="3 Lee and Gulak">{{cite book|title=A transconductor-based field programmable analog array|chapter=A transconductor-based field-programmable analog array|doi=10.1109/ISSCC.1995.535521|isbn=0-7803-2495-1|year=1995|last1=Lee|first1=E.K.F.|last2=Gulak|first2=P.G.|pages=198–199}}</ref> they further elaborated the concept with the inclusion of op-amps, capacitors, and resistors. This original chip was manufactured using 1.2&nbsp;µm CMOS technology and operates in the 20&nbsp;kHz range at a power consumption of 80&nbsp;mW.
 
Pierzchala et al introduced a similar concept named '''electronically-programmable analog circuit''' ('''EPAC''').<ref name="4 Pierzchala">{{cite book|title=Current Mode amplifier/integrator for field programmable analog array|chapter=Current-mode amplifier/Integrator for a field-programmable analog array|doi=10.1109/ISSCC.1995.535520|isbn=0-7803-2495-1|year=1995|last1=Pierzchala|first1=E.|last2=Perkowski|first2=M.A.|last3=Van Halen|first3=P.|last4=Schaumann|first4=R.|pages=196–197}}</ref> It featured only a single integrator. However, they proposed a local interconnect [[Network architecture|architecture]] in order to try and avoid the bandwidth limitations.
 
The '''reconfigurable analog signal processor''' ('''RASP''') and a second version were introduced in 2002 by Hall et al.<ref name="6 Hall">{{cite web|url=https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/354a/bb6fa51506645957efe5effe18741dba0699.pdfbook|title=Field Programmable Analog Arrays: A Floating-Gate Approach|chapter=Field-Programmable Analog Arrays: A Floating—Gate Approach|series=Lecture Notes in Computer Science|year=2002|doi=10.1007/3-540-46117-5_45|s2cid=596774|last1=Hall|first1=Tyson S.|last2=Hasler|first2=Paul|last3=Anderson|first3=David V.|volume=2438|pages=424–433|isbn=978-3-540-44108-3}}</ref><ref name="7 Hall">{{cite journal|title=Large scale field programmable analog arrays for analog signal processing|doi=10.1109/TCSI.2005.853401|year=2005|last1=Hall|first1=T.S.|last2=Twigg|first2=C.M.|last3=Gray|first3=J.D.|last4=Hasler|first4=P.|last5=Anderson|first5=D.V.|journal=IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers|volume=52|issue=11|pages=2298–2307}}</ref> Their design incorporated high-level elements such as second order [[Band-pass filter|bandpass filters]] and 4 by 4 vector matrix multipliers into the CABs. Because of its architecture, it is limited to around 100&nbsp;kHz and the chip itself is not able to support independent reconfiguration.
 
In 2004 Joachim Becker picked up the [[parallel connection]] of OTAs (operational transconductance amplifiers) and proposed its use in a hexagonal local interconnection architecture.<ref name="8 Becker">{{cite journal|title=.,"A continuous-time field programmable analog array (FPAA) consisting of digitally reconfigurable GM-cells|citeseerx = 10.1.1.444.8748}}</ref> It did not require a routing network and eliminated switching the signal path that enhances the frequency response.