Revision as of 12:19, 11 June 2020 edit Shushugah (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 11,186 edits Keep java versions history and improve article instead Tag: 2017 wikitext editor ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:27, 13 June 2020 edit undo Shushugah (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 11,186 edits comment Tag: 2017 wikitext editor Next edit →
Line 12: *'''Keep''', affirming what [[User:Hervegirod\|Hervegirod]] mentioned. We could debate whether this article should be merged into [[Java_(programming_language)]] or not, but the same issues others mentioned would still stand, namely not every JEP note needs to be included, and it's heavily sourced in a way that violates [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]]. But I think a positive outcome of this discussion should be a clarified policy for all programming language versions going forward, because inevitably the sourcing will be largely singular for each and every small feature update/syntax change. [[User:Shushugah\|Shushugah]] ([[User talk:Shushugah\|talk]]) 12:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC) :'''Comment''', if we do seek a rule change/clarity on what change logs are appropriate we should update [[WP:PLOT]] part four [[User:Shushugah\|Shushugah]] ([[User talk:Shushugah\|talk]]) 18:27, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Java version history: Difference between revisions