Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Charles Darwin-Lincoln dispute: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:54, 25 January 2005

Revision as of 05:17, 25 January 2005

Line 20:

''Request done by [[User:Adraeus|Adraeus]]''

Previous to the enabling of protection, [[User:Vfp15|Vincent]] consistently injected trivial, coincidental, useless and irrelevant data concerning Darwin and Lincoln’sLincoln’s sharing of birthdates into the article.

[[User:Vfp15|Vincent]]: '''a)''' claims legitimate albeit abusive operation via adherence to the 3RR Rule, '''b)''' openly declared that he will not relent until administrative action occurs, '''c)''' demonstrated that he will not be dissuaded from his behavior through the addition of said data an estimated thirty-seven (37) times, '''d)''' acknowledges that said data is “silly”“silly” and irrelevant, '''e)''' acknowledges that an estimated thirty-two (32) editors are against inclusion of the aforementioned data, and '''f)''' made no effort to compromise or improve the article while playing the role of the poor, unfortunate victim championing a cause against a horde of tyrannical oppressors.

[[User:Vfp15|Vincent]]'s behavior—perceived as trollish, vandalistic and/or abusive—resulted in an edit war, which recently led to the article's protection. [[User:Adraeus|Adraeus]] 23:59, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Line 30:

I'm unhappy with the fact that I'm listed as a party in this RfAr. I did not participate in the filing of this RfAr, nor am I accused of anything. My only involvement is that in the course of RC-patrolling I reverted edits that were (in my view) clearly in opposition to consensus on the talk page, something I do frequently and which in no way implies any further involvement with the page or its disputes. Unless someone wants to add a complaint about my conduct to this case, I request I be removed from the list of parties. --[[User:fvw|fvw]][[User talk:Fvw|<SMALL><FONT COLOR="green">*</FONT></SMALL>]] 04:14, 2005 Jan 25 (UTC)

:Are you opposed to inclusion of the described factoid in the [[Charles Darwin]] article? Have you reverted edits that were opposed to consensus? If you answered yes to either question, you should provide your support. By default you were included in the list of parties opposed to inclusion of the said factoid, which is reasonable considering you did participate in opposing inclusion. [[User:Adraeus|Adraeus]] 04:51, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

==Statement by affected party==