Talk:Synchronous dynamic random-access memory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 200:
Yes, it makes sense to split the material specific to the original "SDRAM" generation, as opposed to information common to the entire family of standards, to {{no redirect|SDR SDRAM}}, and then merge [[PC66]], [[PC100]], and [[PC133]] into the newly split {{no redirect|SDR SDRAM}}. – [[User:Wbm1058|wbm1058]] ([[User talk:Wbm1058|talk]]) 20:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
* '''Support''' --[[User:Zac67|Zac67]] ([[User talk:Zac67|talk]]) 20:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 
== DDR(X) SDRAM, Connectors' numbers of Pins?? ==
 
Hi All - Wondering: The several sections in the article, e.g. DDR2, DDR3, DDR4, etc; Why do none of these sections make mention of connectors' numbers of pins? e.g. various DDR(X) SDRAM form-factors might be 184 pins, 240 pin (1.5V or 1.8V, two different ones at 240 pins), and/or 288pins.. Info needs to be added, updated? Thanks! -From <b>Peter</b> {a.k.a. [[User:Vid2vid|Vid2vid]] <i>([[User talk:Vid2vid#top|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Vid2vid|contribs]])</i>} 04:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC).