Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Java version history: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Reverted to revision 962381217 by Shushugah (talk): To relist per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 June 18 (TW) |
|||
Line 1:
===[[:Java version history]]===▼
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
▲===[[:Java version history]]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|Java version history}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Java version history|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 10#{{anchorencode:Java version history}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Java_version_history Stats]</span>)
Line 19 ⟶ 13:
*'''Keep''', affirming what [[User:Hervegirod|Hervegirod]] mentioned. We could debate whether this article should be merged into [[Java_(programming_language)]] or not, but the same issues others mentioned would still stand, namely not every JEP note needs to be included, and it's heavily sourced in a way that violates [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]]. But I think a positive outcome of this discussion should be a clarified policy for all programming language versions going forward, because inevitably the sourcing will be largely singular for each and every small feature update/syntax change. [[User:Shushugah|Shushugah]] ([[User talk:Shushugah|talk]]) 12:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
:'''Comment''', if we do seek a rule change/clarity on what change logs are appropriate we should update [[WP:PLOT]] part four [[User:Shushugah|Shushugah]] ([[User talk:Shushugah|talk]]) 18:27, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
|