Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Java version history: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Java version history: keep |
sources? |
||
Line 19:
*'''Keep without a major rewrite, but with more independent sources.''' The only significant issue with this page is with [[WP:NOTCHANGELOG]] (point 4), which states that reliable third-party sources should be used. The information itself should be kept on Wikipedia, perhaps with some minor trimming if it is deemed excessive (as also mentioned in point 4). [[User:Modernponderer|Modernponderer]] ([[User talk:Modernponderer|talk]]) 12:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as per Modernponderer. More 3rd party sources should be used, and the level of detail trimmed a bit, but this is verifiable, useful, and notable. No reason to delete it. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 17:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' {{re|SuperGoose007|Modernponderer|DESiegel}} did you have any particular sources in mind? We need actual (reliable independent) sources to argue notability. [[User:BenKuykendall|BenKuykendall]] ([[User talk:BenKuykendall|talk]]) 04:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
| |||