Content deleted Content added
→Out of date: more precise |
No edit summary |
||
Line 36:
:::Therefore, I am planning to put back the original formulation of the theorem with its proof, and move your contribution to another section. Cheers, [[User:Koertefa|''<span style="color:#2F4F4F">'''K'''<span style="color:Teal">œrte</span>'''F'''</span><span style="color:Teal">a</span>'']] [[User talk:Koertefa#top|<span style="color:#2F4F4F">'''{'''<i style="color:Teal">ταλκ</i>'''}'''</span>]] 10:59, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
::: PS: You have also removed the comment that the proofs are usually not constructive, which is a very important point and should be mentioned. [[User:Koertefa|''<span style="color:#2F4F4F">'''K'''<span style="color:Teal">œrte</span>'''F'''</span><span style="color:Teal">a</span>'']] [[User talk:Koertefa#top|<span style="color:#2F4F4F">'''{'''<i style="color:Teal">ταλκ</i>'''}'''</span>]] 11:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
:::: @[[User:Koertefa|''<span style="color:#2F4F4F">'''K'''<span style="color:Teal">œrte</span>'''F'''</span><span style="color:Teal">a</span>'']] -- I appreciate your concern.
::::* I completely appreciate one should avoiding adding one's own work - this is why I waited between preprint on arXiv (last year) and peer-reviewed publication (this year) to make any changes involving my work. The paper is not just accepted to some conference, it is both peer reviewed and published.
::::* I certainly agree that in general it is instructive to present simple widespread formulations for a general audience! This was the primary purpose of my edit - the previous versions all make additional assumptions; current versions by contrast are much more straightforward. In particular I do not think the current state of having so many versions of the theorem proliferating in the article helps this matter. On the topic of sketchproofs, I agree that these can be instructive, and perhaps a sketchproof of Pinkus' version in particular is worth adding. I do not see the interest in including the sketchproof of Cybenko's result, which is far harder to follow than Pinkus' elegant proof.
::::* I removed the comment on non-constructivity because it is false.
:::: For the above reasons I would like to revert your edits, but I'd prefer to have a discussion about it here first. [[User:PatrickKidger|PatrickKidger]] ([[User talk:PatrickKidger|talk]]) 08:51, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
| |||