Content deleted Content added
GA, with table comments |
m →GA Review: bypass redirect, replaced: {{GAC| → {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC| (4) |
||
Line 11:
! | Review Comment
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | '''1.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: <!-- Well written. Add comments to the ends of the lines below. -->
<!-- The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct. -->
{{GATable/item|1a|y|It is a model of clarity and conciseness.
Line 19:
}}
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | '''2.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}: <!-- Verifiable. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
<!-- It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout.-->
{{GATable/item|2a|y|It is fully and properly cited.
Line 33:
}}
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | '''3.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: <!-- Broad. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
<!-- Coverage. It addresses the [[Wikipedia:Out of scope|main aspects of the topic]]. -->
{{GATable/item|3a|y|It seems to a lay editor to be admirably comprehensive. The topics fit together logically and there are no discernible loose ends.
Line 47:
}}
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | '''6.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: <!-- Images. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
<!-- Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content. -->
{{GATable/item|6a|y|All the images are from Commons and appear to be correctly tagged there.
| |||