|
== The Irish Newspaper Archives ==
[http://www.irishnewsarchive.com/home The Irish Newspaper Archives] , "The largest digital archive of Irish newspapers in the world, providing access to millions of newspaper articles spanning 300+ years of Irish history."♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 16:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
== The Los Angeles Times Archives==
[http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/advancedsearch.html The Los Angeles Times Archives] -millions of articles since 1881 - I know myself and a few west coast and film project editors who'd find this tremendously valuable
#-Especially if ''NY Times'' proves unobtainable. A very right wing paper for the early 20th C but a good source as the century progressed. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 19:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
#{{Ping|Carrite}} Most of LAT is in the Business Source Complete part of [[WP:EBSCO]], 19:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
== Toronto Star Archives ==
#Yes, I agree this would be an excellent resource to gain access to. [[User:Sagaciousphil|<span style="color: Navy">SagaciousPhil</span>]] - [[User Talk:Sagaciousphil|'''Chat''']] 07:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
:We're going to try speaking to them again, but I'm not optimistic due to the way this ties to physical libraries. [[User:Samwalton9|'''S'''am '''W'''alton]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9|talk]]) 11:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
== ProQuest ==
[[ProQuest]]: It began publishing doctoral dissertations in 1939 and has published more than 3 million searchable dissertations and theses. [[User:JimRenge|JimRenge]] ([[User talk:JimRenge|talk]]) 22:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
#:Agree, and suggest looking into some of their ancillary products, such as ProQuest Congressional or ProQuest Legislative Insight; while some of these primarily bring in primary sources, or otherwise freely-available GPO publications, it's much more easily searchable. —/[[User:Mendaliv|'''M'''<small>endaliv</small>]]/<sup><small>[[User talk:Mendaliv|2¢]]</small></sup>/<sub><small>[[Special:Contributions/Mendaliv|Δ's]]</small></sub>/ 18:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
#::{{ping|Mendaliv|JimRenge}}:I have started a promising conversation on this front, though the first partnerships w/ PQ might not be the specific databases you request (once in the door, though, these tend to become much easier.)[[User:Astinson (WMF)|Astinson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Astinson (WMF)|talk]]) 17:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
#::: Thanks for working on the contact; ProQuest would be useful for me too. -- [[User:WeijiBaikeBianji|WeijiBaikeBianji]] ([[User talk:WeijiBaikeBianji|talk]], [[User:WeijiBaikeBianji/Editing|how I edit]]) 18:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
#::::Their [http://www.proquest.com/products-services/eima.html Entertainment Industry Magazine Archive] and [http://www.proquest.com/products-services/pq-hist-news.html Historical Newspapers] databases would be very useful. The latter one includes ''[[The Times of India]]'', one of the most reputed Indian newspapers. It would be very useful for editors working on Indian history during the latter half of the 19th century and whole of the 20th century. Thanks.--[[User:Skr15081997|Skr15081997]] ([[User talk:Skr15081997|talk]]) 12:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
::::* Yes, this should be very helpful. --[[User:Titodutta|Tito Dutta]] ([[User talk:Titodutta|talk]]) 16:56, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
::::* As an editor working on rather controversial topics in the Indian sphere, the Times has a bit of a dodgy reputation, particularly for being even more sensationalist, and poorer with fact-checking and coverage, than many of the other mainstream Indian papers. That said, there are still immense gaps in nitty-gritty uncontroversial Indian topics, and the Times would certainly help with those. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde93]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 17:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
::::* I would also highly appreciate having access to old newspapers for India such as the [[The Times of India]]. [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 17:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
:::::: {{Ping|Kautilya3|Titodutta|Vanamonde93}} I can help out with the Times of India Archives if you have a specific citation in mind. Leave a note on my talk or at [[WP:RX]] - [[User:NQ|'''NQ''']] [[User talk:NQ|<small>(talk)</small>]] 11:50, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
::::::: That's handy to know, NQ. ''The Times of India'' can be rather dodgy nowadays but historically (say, pre-1980s) it was a very good newspaper and access to it would likely be very useful. I have access only to the ProQuest ''Times'' (London) and ''Guardian'' databases and use them a lot ... but rarely when I already know the specific citation because in that circumstance the cite has almost always come from a reliable secondary source anyway. They're better used, like the BNL, for broad searches that then become more specific. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 10:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
* I really doubt they're gonna greenlight freely available downloads of pdfs of dissertations — that's big money to them — but this would be massively important if it could be swung. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 19:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
*{{ping|JimRenge|Mendaliv|Kautilya3|Titodutta|Vanamonde93|Skr15081997|Carrite|Sitush}}: We have another Newspaper database [[WP:Newspaperarchive.com]] and the massive [[WP:EBSCO]] which should provide an intermediary set of material, until we get a relationship with proquest: both provide quite a range of useful tools that might help fill the gaps you all talk about, [[User:Astinson (WMF)|Astinson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Astinson (WMF)|talk]]) 20:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
**As far as I understand the users above talked about Historical Newspapers (including The Times of India), EBSCO and Newspaperarchive.com don't have that material. I vote for ProQuest Historical Newspapers: South China Morning Post and ProQuest Historical Newspapers: Chinese Newspapers Collection. That are absolute unique collections of historical magazines of China and Hong Kong (form the end of XIX century). It's very valuable resource for all users who interested in history of China and Hong Kong.--[[User:Алый Король|Алый Король]] ([[User talk:Алый Король|talk]]) 11:46, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
***{{ping|Алый Король}} Good to know: we have had fruitful initial conversations with [[Eastview]] and [[Newsbank]], though neither are going to be ready for a donation soon; both of these have more global diversity. Though we have approached Proquest a couple times, haven't had a fruitful conversation yet. [[User:Astinson (WMF)|Astinson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Astinson (WMF)|talk]]) 12:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
I second that[[User:Vroy0001|Vroy0001]] ([[User talk:Vroy0001|talk]]) 01:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
===ProQuest Congressional===
It has every Congressional hearing and every floor vote and floor speech in Congress, every CRS report, every GAO report, going back to 1790. Since many floor speeches and congressional hearings contain secondary sources placed in the record in their entirety, this is not only a great primary source but also a good source for secondary material. [[User:Figureofnine|Figureofnine]] <small>([[User talk:Figureofnine|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Figureofnine|contribs]])</small> 00:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|Figureofnine}} We have yet to find a profitable conversation with ProQuest. When we do, I will make sure to request access to this particular database. [[User:Astinson (WMF)|Astinson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Astinson (WMF)|talk]]) 19:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
::That would be outstanding if you can do hat. Thanks so much. [[User:Figureofnine|Figureofnine]] <small>([[User talk:Figureofnine|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Figureofnine|contribs]])</small> 16:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
{{ping|Astinson (WMF)}} I was just discussing with somebody how useful this resource would be, We believe it has access to ''The Times of India'' archives which could prove extremely useful for older films on wikipedia. If you could try to contact them I'd be immensely grateful.♦ [[User:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 08:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
:I think you may be thinking of ProQuest Historical Newspapers. However ProQuest Congressional stands on its own merits. Sure hope we can get it. [[User:Figureofnine|Figureofnine]] <small>([[User talk:Figureofnine|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Figureofnine|contribs]])</small> 17:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
===[[ProQuest NewsStand]]===
Extensive news archive; I had free access to this for a few years through my county library, but low take-up by the hicks and hayseeds in my county led to the library services manager not renewing the partnership :( I found this incredibly useful for my WP editing, and their pre-London ''Guardian'' archive was a treasure. Maybe they would consider a small trial? [[User:Keri|Keri]] ([[User talk:Keri|talk]]) 13:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
:Hi {{Ping|Keri}}: We are working on access to Proquest databases, but have yet to find a good person to talk too for a donation. Hopefully we find someone this week during the ALA conference. In the meantime, a lot of editors have been happy with [[WP:Newspapers.com]] and [[WP:BNA]] for historical materials. We are also in the process of negotiating several other newspaper databases, which I will try to ping you about when they become available (one of them will be in our next distribution in late July/ early August). [[User:Astinson (WMF)|Astinson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Astinson (WMF)|talk]]) 15:13, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
::Thanks for the update. I use both those archives, and find them very useful! The ProQuest NewsStand archive that was available through my library was particularly useful for its content from the 1990s and early 21st C though. Would be great if you managed to get something. I'll watch developments eagerly. [[User:Keri|Keri]] ([[User talk:Keri|talk]]) 15:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
::ProQuest Historical, as I think it is called, would be helpful by archiving newspapers not on the Internet. ProQuest Congressional, as noted above, would also be invaluable. [[User:Figureofnine|Figureofnine]] <small>([[User talk:Figureofnine|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Figureofnine|contribs]])</small> 17:53, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
===[http://library.harvard.edu/ Harvard Library]===
{{ping|Samwalton9 (WMF)}}, my passion is in 1990's educational video games, and Harvard Library is perfect of this. I would really love access.--[[User:Coin945|Coin945]] ([[User talk:Coin945|talk]]) 12:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
:{{re|Coin945}} This is a library, that subscribes to a number of journals/databases/publishers. What in particular are you interested in accessing? [[User:Samwalton9 (WMF)|Samwalton9 (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9 (WMF)|talk]]) 13:02, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
::{{ping|Samwalton9 (WMF)}} oh apologies, perhaps I was a bit vague. I am seeking access to the Harvard Library catalogue. (Link is in the section header).--[[User:Coin945|Coin945]] ([[User talk:Coin945|talk]]) 13:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
:::{{re|Coin945}} If you want access to Harvard's catalogue that would fall under the [[Wikipedia:Visiting Scholars|visiting scholars]] program. If there are specific databases or publishers that they have in their collection, then I can look into whether we have them or could get access to them. [[User:Samwalton9 (WMF)|Samwalton9 (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9 (WMF)|talk]]) 13:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
:::As an addendum: We could look into a partnership with [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/ Harvard University Press] for the resources published by Harvard themselves. [[User:Samwalton9 (WMF)|Samwalton9 (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9 (WMF)|talk]]) 13:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Samwalton9 (WMF)}} I looked more into the sources I want to use - the majority of them are actually links to documents within ProQuest. So that makes my suggestion the same as the one for Proquest above. Still, it would be nice for Wikipedia to partner with Harvard. :)--[[User:Coin945|Coin945]] ([[User talk:Coin945|talk]]) 04:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Just a minor update that I had a very encouraging discussion recently, and while it's almost certainly the case that nothing will be happening before this summer, I'm optimistic :) [[User:Samwalton9 (WMF)|Samwalton9 (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9 (WMF)|talk]]) 17:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
:{{u|Samwalton9 (WMF)}}, any updates? [[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style="color: red">∯</span><span style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:#070">WBG</b></span>]][[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<sup><span style="color:#00F">converse</span></sup>]] 11:36, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
::Our partnership with ProQuest, along with a few others, is waiting on proxy implementation in the Library Card platform. [[User:Samwalton9 (WMF)|Samwalton9 (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9 (WMF)|talk]]) 07:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
:::{{u|Samwalton9 (WMF)}}, good to know that and many thanks for your (and others') efforts:-) Curious to know about the ''few others''! And, any rough estimate about the timeline for proxy implementation? [[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style="color: red">∯</span><span style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:#070">WBG</b></span>]][[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<sup><span style="color:#00F">converse</span></sup>]] 16:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
::::It's actually pretty sad (and frustrating) that the WMF, [[WP:CANCER|despite it's cancerous growth]], can't devote the optimal amount of resources to these technical affairs.
::::
::::Having partners ready to grant us access but not being able to, due to technical barriers from our side is pretty pretty horrible, IMO. [[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style="color: red">∯</span><span style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:#070">WBG</b></span>]][[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<sup><span style="color:#00F">converse</span></sup>]] 18:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
:{{ping|JimRenge|Mendaliv|WeijiBaikeBianji|Skr15081997|Titodutta|Vanamonde93|Kautilya3|Sitush|Carrite|Алый Король|Vroy0001|Figureofnine|Encyclopædius|Keri|Coin945|Winged Blades of Godric}} Good news folks - we just made [https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/partners/82/ a bunch of ProQuest collections] available through the Library Card platform! Our partnership includes ProQuest Central, in which you can find many of the above requested collections, including up-to-date content from major news websites like the New York Times and Washington Post, in addition to Literature Online, the Chinese Newspaper Collections, and Historical New York Times! The best part is that ProQuest is part of [[:meta:Library Card platform/Authentication-based access|the new Library Bundle]], which means if you meet our automatically-checked account criteria you can access ProQuest right away. Head over to https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/ and log in - if you see that you meet the Bundle eligibility criteria, you'll be able to access ProQuest through [https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/users/my_library/ My Library] right away. Please let me know if you have any questions or feedback on the process. [[User:Samwalton9 (WMF)|Samwalton9 (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9 (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
== Wiley Online Library ==
== Karger Publishers ==
# [[Karger Publishers]]: 80+ journals—For [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Primates|WikiProject Primates]], it would help to have access to ''[[Folia Primatologica]]''. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; font-family: fantasy, cursive, Serif">'''– [[User:Maky|<font color="darkgreen">Maky</font>]] <sup>«[[User talk:Maky|<font color="olive"> talk </font>]]»</sup>'''</span> 09:09, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
== SpringerNature ==
# [[Springer Science+Business Media|SpringerLink]]: Scientific documents, including 5 million articles and 3 million chapters. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; font-family: fantasy, cursive, Serif">'''– [[User:Maky|<font color="darkgreen">Maky</font>]] <sup>«[[User talk:Maky|<font color="olive"> talk </font>]]»</sup>'''</span> 09:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
#:I should also note that along with Elsevier and Wiley, this is another huge pay-wall for my research. (Although Karger would be very nice, these three are the "holy trinity" for my referencing.) Of particular note, this publisher is the biggest source of '''secondary sources''' (books and chapters, along with other articles) in my area of expertise. Though journal articles are very helpful, books and book chapters can be critical. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; font-family: fantasy, cursive, Serif">'''– [[User:Maky|<font color="darkgreen">Maky</font>]] <sup>«[[User talk:Maky|<font color="olive"> talk </font>]]»</sup>'''</span> 09:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
#:Seconded. [[User:YohanN7|YohanN7]] ([[User talk:YohanN7|talk]]) 21:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
#: Agreed with the other editors that SpringerLink is very useful. I'd be delighted to link to their resources with the usual Wikipedia Library acknowledgement. -- [[User:WeijiBaikeBianji|WeijiBaikeBianji]] ([[User talk:WeijiBaikeBianji|talk]], [[User:WeijiBaikeBianji/Editing|how I edit]]) 18:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
::{{Ping|Maky|YohanN7|WeijiBaikeBianji}} We have been trying to start a conversation with Springer, and were event told that we had the contact with the right person, but haven't seen a bite yet. I would really like to prioritize Springer, but the recent merge with Nature seems to have shaken up their organization a little bit. [[User:Astinson (WMF)|Astinson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Astinson (WMF)|talk]]) 12:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
:::Definitely keep us posted. Between Wiley and Springer, this covers about 75% of the material I access. Thanks! <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; font-family: fantasy, cursive, Serif">'''– [[User:Maky|<font color="darkgreen">Maky</font>]] <sup>«[[User talk:Maky|<font color="olive"> talk </font>]]»</sup>'''</span> 00:57, 25 September 2015
::::{{Ping|Maky|YohanN7|WeijiBaikeBianji}} I did some further followup with both Nature and Springer, and the chaos/focus of the merger has caused a fair bit of delay on their end. We are going to re-explore in about 4-5 months, [[User:Astinson (WMF)|Astinson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Astinson (WMF)|talk]]) 17:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
::::: Thanks for letting us know. -- [[User:WeijiBaikeBianji|WeijiBaikeBianji]] ([[User talk:WeijiBaikeBianji|Watch my talk]], [[User:WeijiBaikeBianji/Editing|How I edit]]) 11:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
:::: Hi everyone, just checking in here about SpringerLink. Would be great to access journals and books for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computer_Security|WikiProject Computer Security]] work. Specifically, the [https://link.springer.com/journal/10207 International Journal of Information Security] would be highly useful. [[User:Seba5tien|<b style="color:purple;">Seba5tien</b>]] (<sup>[[User_talk:Seba5tien|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Seba5tien|contribs]]</sub>) 16:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
:::::{{re|Seba5tien}} We'd still love to get access to Springer/Nature, but they still seem to be unsure who would be the right person at the organisation to handle a partnership like this; we'll try again early next year. [[User:Samwalton9 (WMF)|Samwalton9 (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9 (WMF)|talk]]) 11:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|Samwalton9 (WMF)}} any news on this access? :) [[User:Samat|Samat]] ([[User talk:Samat|talk]]) 19:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
:::::::{{re|Samat}} Not right now, but it's a priority for us this year. [[User:Samwalton9 (WMF)|Samwalton9 (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9 (WMF)|talk]]) 10:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
::::::::Great to hear. Thank you! [[User:Samat|Samat]] ([[User talk:Samat|talk]]) 13:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
=== Nature, NPG (Macmillan Publishers Limited) ===
[http://www.nature.com/nature/index.html Nature, NPG (Macmillan Publishers Limited)]: Another one of the most influential and prestigious scientific journals. Free registration seems to only give access to news and nothing else. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; font-family: fantasy, cursive, Serif">'''– [[User:Maky|<font color="darkgreen">Maky</font>]] <sup>«[[User talk:Maky|<font color="olive"> talk </font>]]»</sup>'''</span> 17:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
#:I concur that one. This is the journal I requested the most articles in the "article exchange" space. I don't know if this journal is part of any databases or not, but some Wikipedians seems to have access to it since my request always got filled by different Wikipedians. [[User:Amqui|Amqui]] ([[User talk:Amqui|talk]]) 17:24, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|Maky|Amqui}} We have tried to start conversations with them multiple times, but no bites. Hopefully the recent merge with Springer will make them easier to negotiate with, but we have also been hearing that the has also been a bit of an organization/staff change up as the merger is happening.[[User:Astinson (WMF)|Astinson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Astinson (WMF)|talk]]) 13:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
::Thanks for the update. This is definitely the pay wall I hit against the most often in my work contributing to Wikipedia. [[User:Amqui|Amqui]] ([[User talk:Amqui|talk]]) 17:04, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Maky|Amqui}} We got pretty far in our latest round of outreach with Nature, but the chaos of the merger with Springer is preventing a firm decision/commitment. We were told to reapproach in 4-5 months. Hopefully thinks will settle down in the meantime, [[User:Astinson (WMF)|Astinson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Astinson (WMF)|talk]])
::::Thanks for the update, and for your work. [[User:Amqui|Amqui]] ([[User talk:Amqui|talk]]) 21:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
{{ping|Astinson (WMF)}} Any update on this one? [[User:Amqui|Amqui]] ([[User talk:Amqui|talk]]) 18:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
:::::::{{ping|Amqui|Maky}} The last couple times we reached out, they still seem to be not sure who to talk too because of the merger. {{ping|User:Samwalton9}} is going to be coordinating most of our outreach to publishers for the foreseeable future -- and Nature/Springer is high on our list of priority partners. [[User:Astinson (WMF)|Astinson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Astinson (WMF)|talk]]) 13:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
::::::::Thanks, [[User:Amqui|Amqui]] ([[User talk:Amqui|talk]]) 15:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
:{{re|Maky|Amqui}} It's just come to my attention that [[WP:Gale|Gale]] have access to [https://www.mcls.org/news/gale-adds-nature-publishing-group-to-academic-onefile/ a number of Nature journals]. This might be worth checking out if you're still interested. [[User:Samwalton9 (WMF)|Samwalton9 (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9 (WMF)|talk]]) 09:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
::{{re|Samwalton9 (WMF)}} Thanks, I will check. [[User:Amqui|Amqui]] ([[User talk:Amqui|talk]]) 14:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
:{{ping|Maky|YohanN7|WeijiBaikeBianji|Seba5tien|Samat|Amqui}} Good news folks - we just made [https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/partners/67/ Springer Nature] available for access through the Library Card platform! After you've been approved for access, you'll be able to access Springer Nature through our new [[:meta:Library Card platform/Authentication-based access|Authentication-based access]] method at [https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/users/my_library/ My Library] right away, rather than having to manage an individual username/password. Please let me know if you have any questions or feedback on the process. [[User:Samwalton9 (WMF)|Samwalton9 (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Samwalton9 (WMF)|talk]]) 08:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
== Westlaw and Lexis ==
| 