Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
some additional evidence |
||
Line 40:
Of course, the standard approaches don't seem to be a lot of help to most people, especially non-experts, in understanding physics. So I think that, like other ambiguous stuff that you need to be a physicist (and preferably a historian of physics) to understand, it should just be removed. (Like I did on the Copenhagen page. What do you think of it btw?) -- ark
----
Someone deleted my previous note that at least one scientist has actually used this to transmit information, based on the "fact" that its not possible to do so. Tell that to him--he'd already done it. Classical music, to my recollection. Anyway, here is a formal piece of evidence thats just cropped up:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,4522247%255E2702,00.html
The URL's a little mangled...
--Alan D
| |||