Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nnn (file manager): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Kj cheetham (talk | contribs) keep |
FenixFeather (talk | contribs) →Nnn (file manager): New "sources" are terrible |
||
Line 11:
'''KEEP''' - Article references seems to have improved markedly since the AfD, and it's quite clear that it's a widely known piece of software in it's niche. - [[User:Snori|Snori]] ([[User talk:Snori|talk]]) 02:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' It seems to have some independant coverage. -[[User:Kj cheetham|Kj cheetham]] ([[User talk:Kj cheetham|talk]]) 11:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
:: It's not enough that there are more independent references. Sources must cover the topic in a significant way. The new "sources" that have been added are the literal readme from the repo, and a few listicles from Linux websites that have passing mentions to the software. Wikipiedia is not supposed to be a comprehensive collection of all software tools in the world. If this software becomes notable, it'll get an article eventually. – [[User:FenixFeather|<b style="color:SlateBlue">''FenixFeather''</b>]] <sup>[[User talk:FenixFeather|<span style="color:SlateBlue">(talk)</span>]][[Special:Contributions/FenixFeather|<span style="color:SlateBlue">(Contribs)</span>]]</sup> 21:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
| |||