Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 8 discussion(s) to Talk:Oracle Database/Archive 1) (bot |
→Final comment in main article does not follow NPOV: new section |
||
Line 131:
[[User:JFVerrier|JFVerrier]] ([[User talk:JFVerrier|talk]]) 13:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)JFVerrier
:: {{U|JFVerrier}} ... Given Dell and Oracle have a competition overlap the in x86 midrange server market perhaps {{U|Jzg}}/Guy should strictly not have commented, though I'd broadly concur with having nightmares on the Oracle edelivery website until I'd got some sort of knack, but I'm pretty useless and I've also had difficulties (nightmares) on IBM, HP, etc. too ... and even a few blue words at the Dell website for that matter all for the old [[Patches (Chairmen of the Board song)|patches]]. I note you seem to have referred to ''Oracle Database'' as simply ''Oracle'' which perhaps is interesting given your earlier comments. In my opinion it is well possible to write a suitable article on Oracle Database product ... I would treat it the same way I treat a steam engine article. But it requires diligence and criticisms and warts and history to be considered. As with all software one only really knows what was wrongs with version X-1 when version X comes out. But in general the treatment this article has just received is little different than that received by some other commercial software products in my opinion. I too have invested my time with you. thankyou.[[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 22:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
== Final comment in main article does not follow NPOV ==
The last line in the main article does not appear to follow NPOV. Using words like 'fleecing' suggest underhand dealings by the company. This should be rephrased and citations about legal cases/controversies given.
| |||